![]() |
|||
Southeast Spotlight: tough cuts to school construction, students, and AMHS serviceDear Neighbors, Given the increased activity in the home stretch of the session, I’ll be posting more frequent editions of Southeast Spotlight. Please also check out my Facebook and Twitter pages for daily updates and postings. Bond Debt ReimbursementThe Department of Education’s Bond Debt Reimbursement program was under attack last week, with a bill that instituted a five-year holiday on approval of new debt for school construction and major maintenance (SB64). The bill passed the Senate and the House. However, the effective date did not pass, which draws into question the constitutionality of the measure because of a retroactivity clause that makes the bill effective on January 1st, 2015. The failure of the effective date means that projects approved by voters in elections this spring (Anchorage, Bristol Bay and Dillingham) will still be able to enter into contracts that would need to be honored when the retroactivity language takes effect. This is one of the more complicated results from our legislative process, so if you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or my office for additional information.
State Budget Under Further Attack Last week, the Senate approved an operating budget that took an additional $1.75 Million out of the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS) budget, and deleted efforts by the House to try to restore service. AMHS will be in a difficult position if funding is not restored to allow for regular operations this summer in transition to a more limited operational schedule in the future.
AddendumIn last week’s edition, I discussed agency performance reviews being conducted by Legislative Budget & Audit (LB&A). I wanted to mention that the legislature has also commissioned a study of the overall funding mechanism Alaska uses for education. LB&A held a public hearing for this study, and the Alaska Association of Superintendents was in town and its members were able to provide input (see photo). Many of the comments supported our current funding formula’s division of funds. We understand that there are concerns about the level of funding, and this will continue to be an issue, but the method for allocating the funding has received support from many of the districts in Alaska. [Correction: Last week’s newsletter referenced HB130, when it should have read HB30. Please excuse the typographical error.] As always, please contact me if you have any questions or if I can be of service. Best Wishes,
|
|||
|