During the 1980s, there was a long-standing dispute between commercial banks and the State of Alaska regarding the negotiability of state treasury warrants. This dispute was ultimately resolved by the Alaska Supreme Court in National Bank of Alaska v. Univentures 1231, 824 P.2d 1377 (Alaska 1992), which held that state treasury warrants were negotiable instruments under the Uniform Commercial Code and were therefore subject to the "holder in due course" defense. This was an important protection for businesses with financial dealings with the State. Although the Division of Finance amended its business practices to comply with the Supreme Court ruling, Alaska statutes have never been amended to incorporate this holding. HB 373 simply codifies the holding the National Bank of Alaska v. Univentures 1231.

The State Affairs Committee is introducing this legislation in order to clarify Alaska statutes and continue the modernization of the state treasury warrant system.