| |
Capitol Undercurrents
Wild and natural?—Picture this
(or not, depending on your moral compass): 1) the governor wants to
hold a press conference Monday at the Council on State Government
national meeting in Anchorage with the Legal Seafood chain restaurateur who advertises salmon
by saying “If it’s not wild, it’s not Legal;” 2) the governor wants
to use the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute’s
adorned-with-fish-pictures booth as a backdrop for the press event;
and 3) then somebody mentions a problem—the ASMI booth is right
smack up against another CSG booth sponsored by the American
Association for Nude Recreation with some tasteful au naturel
pictures of its own. Not wanting to confuse the wild and natural
messages, the governor moved the press conference to another booth
sponsored by the state.
Remember when?—The May 1974
Southeast Alaska Transportation Study and the governor’s new
transportation plan (see attached column) came to diametrically
opposed conclusions about our region’s transportation
infrastructure. Part of the 1974 study read: “The present marine
transportation system has several advantages over the land
highway/shuttle system ferry alternative: public costs would be
less; user costs would be less. . .; for trips of more than local
short distances, the ferry system represents a considerable savings
in time over land highway/shuttle ferry alternative; the ferry is a
more efficient user of energy than the automobile; (and) the ferry
is more flexible and easily adaptable to future changes in
transportation needs. . .” That was 30 years ago. Now the new
administration is finding the opposite.
The sound of four hands
clapping—
I wasn’t there but an
attendee well known for impeccable credentials in the truth
department said when Gov. Murkowski received an award for being the
outgoing head of the Council of State Governments at a Monday
evening gala dinner two of his cabinet members (Corrections’ Mark
Antrim and Labor’s Greg O’Claray) leapt to their feet to lead a
standing ovation. Nobody else followed, including other cabinet
members and the chief of staff.
Four strikes ‘n y’r out—Remember
the big dust-up when voting pamphlets arrived a few days late (but
well before the election) in a very small number of election
districts back when Lt. Gov. Fran Ulmer was in charge of elections?
Despite the fact it was a contractor’s problem, the Republican
partisan corps opened up with all the howitzers. Where are they now?
The courts slam-dunked Lt. Gov. Loren Leman Wednesday and told him
to reprint all general election ballots. The judge said Leman presented a “factually inaccurate” description with
“impermissible advocacy” ballot description of the initiative to
provide for election of U.S. senators to vacancies instead of the
process used to appoint the governor’s daughter. This is the fourth
time he’s lost in court on this one ballot issue alone. Sponsors of
the initiative had to sue him three times before to: 1) force him to
timely complete his statutorily-mandated duty to review their
initiative petition; 2) force him to certify the petition; and 3)
force him to put the initiative on the ballot. We don’t know how
much the court battles cost the state (in dollars or in wasted AG
time) but we do know the lite guv’s latest loss will cost close to
$300,000 in ballot reprinting costs to protect, as the judge said,
the “sanctity” of the election process.
Movin' on—Former Palmer Senator
Scott Ogan's top aide, Linda Hay, started a new job today. She's the
new deputy legislative liaison in the governor's office. Her last
official day in the senator's office involved duty with a
shredder.
|
|
|
|
I
presented an Alaska Flag to the soldiers Thursday of A Company,
Third Battalion (Scout), 287th Infantry of the 207th Infantry Group
(Scout) headquartered in Juneau. They are traveling to Fort
Richardson for pre-mobilization before departing to their duty
assignments. The unit will be assigned to blend with units from
Hawaii that are bound for Iraq. The flag will go with them and
return with them to hang in the new armory/UA facility. We wish all
the Juneau soldier well and want them to know we are hoping for
their safe return.
New team, new transporation
plan
The newest
Southeast Alaska Transportation Plan lacks charity and clarity of
thought. Charity of thought because public input was dissed and
clarity of thought because the plan doesn’t reflect federal economic
reality. On the
whole, the SATP update seems more an exercise in the Department of
Transportation and Public Facilities doing what the governor wants
regardless of the desires of communities served. A few cases in
point:
90 percent of those who submitted comments on the draft
plan’s road/shuttle options endorsed the existing ferry system but
not a single road was re-examined;
- despite testimony about a lattice of
roads disrupting communities and pressuring wildlife populations,
the SATP says only “the substitution of land highway . . . will
bring change” and deferred specifics to the NEPA review process
but the U.S. forest Service said the plan didn’t describe several
projects well enough to even start the NEPA review
process;
- nearly all the comments from Sitka
said they didn’t want a road to Baranof Warm Springs but no change
was made;
- the governor wants $1.3 billion in
congressional earmarks for Southeast projects to accomplish his
plan but, assuming the highly improbable (can earmarks of that
magnitude make it through a congress struggling with runaway
budgets vs. tax cuts?), the $1.3 billion for the governor’s dream
may doom federal dollars for a second crossing or safe
intersections at Sunny Point and Yandukin Drive;
- Rep. Don Young’s transportation bill
(TEA-LU) has just over 1 percent of the gov’s pie-in-the-sky
aspirations for SE transportation but his bill is mired in
conference committee and as chair of the House Transportation
Committee even he doesn’t think his bill will pass this
year;
apparently, lack of immediate action in the
federal budget is no problem for the SE plan because, says the
state, it’ll just take longer to finish the plan but, oops, if it
takes longer we’ll hit international maritime safety deadlines
that’ll take our older ferries off-line;
- the road link plan, if accomplished,
will require 13 ferries, not the current nine;
- and those ferries would be primarily
short-run daytime boats despite the plan’s assertion that roads
put the choice of travel times entirely into the drivers’
hands.
Whew!
That’s just a partial list of plan assumptions and real world
issues.
This is a
soft porn plan—it teases and tantalizes but demeans the
transportation infrastructure and is ultimately shallow. Combine the
above issues with recent events (the $74,000 diversion of the
Kennicott for an Anchorage convention, the use of the Taku for the
governor’s excursion to Hoonah, the rural route privatization
language in employee contracts, and the headquarters move that
prompted an out-migration of professional employees) and it’s no
wonder there was some skepticism expressed during the SATP public
comment period. It’s unfair
of anyone, including me, to simply say to the governor “we don’t
like your vision—it’s not based in federal fiscal reality.” After
all, one of my favorite refrains is from the musical South Pacific
where a singer points out “You got to have a dream, If you don’t
have a dream then how you gonna make a dream come true?” I suspect,
though, that a dream that doesn’t prioritize a $1.3 billion wish
list is more a political document than a planning document. Why
can’t we start by analyzing needs and designing ferries and some
potential roads that meet the specific needs? Why can’t we get away
from a planning process and a plan that changes with each new
administration?
|
|