Senator Kim Elton
off the record
a VIP policy letter
from
Senator Kim Elton
Room 115, State Capitol, Juneau, AK 99801 * 465-4947 Phone * 465-2108 FAX

Edition # 184                    Please feel free to forward                 October 1, 2004

 

Capitol Undercurrents

Wild and natural?—Picture this (or not, depending on your moral compass): 1) the governor wants to hold a press conference Monday at the Council on State Government national meeting in Anchorage with the Legal Nude recreationSeafood chain restaurateur who advertises salmon by saying “If it’s not wild, it’s not Legal;” 2) the governor wants to use the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute’s adorned-with-fish-pictures booth as a backdrop for the press event; and 3) then somebody mentions a problem—the ASMI booth is right smack up against another CSG booth sponsored by the American Association for Nude Recreation with some tasteful au naturel pictures of its own. Not wanting to confuse the wild and natural messages, the governor moved the press conference to another booth sponsored by the state.
 
Remember when?—The May 1974 Southeast Alaska Transportation Study and the governor’s new transportation plan (see attached column) came to diametrically opposed conclusions about our region’s transportation infrastructure. Part of the 1974 study read: “The present marine transportation system has several advantages over the land highway/shuttle system ferry alternative: public costs would be less; user costs would be less. . .; for trips of more than local short distances, the ferry system represents a considerable savings in time over land highway/shuttle ferry alternative; the ferry is a more efficient user of energy than the automobile; (and) the ferry is more flexible and easily adaptable to future changes in transportation needs. . .” That was 30 years ago. Now the new administration is finding the opposite.
 
The sound of four hands clapping—
Applause please?I wasn’t there but an attendee well known for impeccable credentials in the truth department said when Gov. Murkowski received an award for being the outgoing head of the Council of State Governments at a Monday evening gala dinner two of his cabinet members (Corrections’ Mark Antrim and Labor’s Greg O’Claray) leapt to their feet to lead a standing ovation. Nobody else followed, including other cabinet members and the chief of staff.
 
Four strikes ‘n y’r out—Remember the big dust-up when voting pamphlets arrived a few days late (but well before the election) in a very small number of election districts back when Lt. Gov. Fran Ulmer was in charge of elections? Despite the fact it was a contractor’s problem, the Republican partisan corps opened up with all the howitzers. Where are they now? The courts slam-dunked Lt. Gov. Loren Leman Wednesday and told him to reprint all general election ballots. The judge said Four strikes ‘n y’r outLeman presented a “factually inaccurate” description with “impermissible advocacy” ballot description of the initiative to provide for election of U.S. senators to vacancies instead of the process used to appoint the governor’s daughter. This is the fourth time he’s lost in court on this one ballot issue alone. Sponsors of the initiative had to sue him three times before to: 1) force him to timely complete his statutorily-mandated duty to review their initiative petition; 2) force him to certify the petition; and 3) force him to put the initiative on the ballot. We don’t know how much the court battles cost the state (in dollars or in wasted AG time) but we do know the lite guv’s latest loss will cost close to $300,000 in ballot reprinting costs to protect, as the judge said, the “sanctity” of the election process.
 
Movin' on—Former Palmer Senator Scott Ogan's top aide, Linda Hay, started a new job today. She's the new deputy legislative liaison in the governor's office. Her last official day in the senator's office involved duty with a shredder.
 
Phone: (907) 465-4947
Fax: (907) 465-2108
Mail: Sen. Elton, State Capitol
Juneau, AK 99801
Email:
Senator.Kim.Elton
Jesse.Kiehl
Paula.Cadiente
Web: http://elton.akdemocrats.org
   
Presenting flag to National Guard
 
I presented an Alaska Flag to the soldiers Thursday of A Company, Third Battalion (Scout), 287th Infantry of the 207th Infantry Group (Scout) headquartered in Juneau. They are traveling to Fort Richardson for pre-mobilization before departing to their duty assignments. The unit will be assigned to blend with units from Hawaii that are bound for Iraq. The flag will go with them and return with them to hang in the new armory/UA facility. We wish all the Juneau soldier well and want them to know we are hoping for their safe return.
 

 
New team, new transporation plan
 
     The newest Southeast Alaska Transportation Plan lacks charity and clarity of thought. Charity of thought because public input was dissed and clarity of thought because the plan doesn’t reflect federal economic reality. 
     On the whole, the SATP update seems more an exercise in the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities doing what the governor wants regardless of the desires of communities served. A few cases in point:
  • Roads90 percent of those who submitted comments on the draft plan’s road/shuttle options endorsed the existing ferry system but not a single road was re-examined;
  • despite testimony about a lattice of roads disrupting communities and pressuring wildlife populations, the SATP says only “the substitution of land highway . . . will bring change” and deferred specifics to the NEPA review process but the U.S. forest Service said the plan didn’t describe several projects well enough to even start the NEPA review process;
  • nearly all the comments from Sitka said they didn’t want a road to Baranof Warm Springs but no change was made;
  • the governor wants $1.3 billion in congressional earmarks for Southeast projects to accomplish his plan but, assuming the highly improbable (can earmarks of that magnitude make it through a congress struggling with runaway budgets vs. tax cuts?), the $1.3 billion for the governor’s dream may doom federal dollars for a second crossing or safe intersections at Sunny Point and Yandukin Drive;
  • Rep. Don Young’s transportation bill (TEA-LU) has just over 1 percent of the gov’s pie-in-the-sky aspirations for SE transportation but his bill is mired in conference committee and as chair of the House Transportation Committee even he doesn’t think his bill will pass this year;
  • Ferriesapparently, lack of immediate action in the federal budget is no problem for the SE plan because, says the state, it’ll just take longer to finish the plan but, oops, if it takes longer we’ll hit international maritime safety deadlines that’ll take our older ferries off-line;
  • the road link plan, if accomplished, will require 13 ferries, not the current nine;
  • and those ferries would be primarily short-run daytime boats despite the plan’s assertion that roads put the choice of travel times entirely into the drivers’ hands.
     Whew! That’s just a partial list of plan assumptions and real world issues. 
     This is a soft porn plan—it teases and tantalizes but demeans the transportation infrastructure and is ultimately shallow. Combine the above issues with recent events (the $74,000 diversion of the Kennicott for an Anchorage convention, the use of the Taku for the governor’s excursion to Hoonah, the rural route privatization language in employee contracts, and the headquarters move that prompted an out-migration of professional employees) and it’s no wonder there was some skepticism expressed during the SATP public comment period.
     It’s unfair of anyone, including me, to simply say to the governor “we don’t like your vision—it’s not based in federal fiscal reality.” After all, one of my favorite refrains is from the musical South Pacific where a singer points out “You got to have a dream, If you don’t have a dream then how you gonna make a dream come true?”
     I suspect, though, that a dream that doesn’t prioritize a $1.3 billion wish list is more a political document than a planning document. Why can’t we start by analyzing needs and designing ferries and some potential roads that meet the specific needs? Why can’t we get away from a planning process and a plan that changes with each new administration?