A series of events that discombobulate
Several
years ago, my staff added a Saturday night dinner and 15-minute
speech at an event
honoring Eagle Scouts. A rule I generally
try to follow during the session is I'm allowed to work 24
hours a day five days a week but the weekend is for family
and home. But exceptions are made and staff knew without asking
I'd want to make an exception for the scouts.
That Saturday I sat down and jotted out talking
points designed to encourage teens to think of a career in public service. That
theme, I thought, was pertinent as these young men, who had already made some
good decisions in the past, were beginning to make decisions about their future.
When I arrived at the dinner that evening,
public service career talking points tucked into the inner pocket of my suit
jacket, I was met by an exuberant older fellow. In the course of draping heavy
strings of Mardi Gras beads around my neck, he simultaneously welcomed me to
the New Orleans-themed annual dinner of delegates from the Alaska aeries of the
Fraternal Order of Eagles. Shortly after, a nice woman who wanted to talk politics
spilled red wine on my tie and white shirt. (Spilling the wine didn't bother
her at all--there was plenty more where that came from.)
So, seated at the head table between a visiting
Eagle dignitary from some state in the middle part of America and an Alaska Eagle
officer, I scratched out my talking point advice for a career in public service
and tried to pencil in comments more fitting to the very celebratory occasion.
My new remarks that night were forgettable but I do remember my speech Monday
morning when I suggested to staff that more care needed to be given to correctly
defining the nature of the events they schedule. I told them I now knew there
were at least three kinds of Eagles: the clan shared by many of our neighbors
and the two that had gotten confused on the schedule--scouts and aeries. I knew
the first two far better than the last one.
I tell this rather long story to explain
that the discombobulated feeling I had for a few hours that long-ago Saturday
night is similar to the feeling I've had now for the past few weeks. Look at
the discombobulating events of the last month:
the governor gets bounced in
the primary, landing as hard primary night as Eddie "The
Eagle" Edwards (that awkward and goofy British plasterer
who gained fame as Britain's first and only Olympic ski jumper)
often did during the '88 Olympics;
- half the Prudhoe Bay oil production
is shut down because of pipeline corrosion issues that "surprised" BP,
the field operator;
- the price of Alaska's oil in
the market keeps dropping to the point it is now $16 less
than the midsummer price;
- the FBI raids six legislative
offices, apparently looking for links between money and policy
decisions; and
- the managers of state and municipal
public employee and teacher pension funds drop a half-billion
dollar collection notice on employers of Alaskans that deliver
services around the state.
Whew!
Perhaps the only good news in all this is
that Alaskans get to hire their CEO and board of directors in just 45 days. The
general election races for governor and for state legislators are, fundamentally,
a job interview process. And Alaskans, if they so desire, get to do the interviews
and participate in the hiring. I hope they so desire.
I'll 'fess up--I have a stake in all this
because I am being interviewed for rehire. Nonetheless, I have some suggested
interview questions.
It's too simple to say that Prudhoe is partially
closed because of pipeline corrosion. So those who want to guide the state on
your behalf should be asked: "did the state fail in its responsibility to regulate
the field and should BP be allowed to deduct the cost of its failures from state
taxes?"
Nearly 90 percent of Alaska's general fund
budget is based on oil. So those who want to guide the state on your behalf should
be asked: "what are you doing to make other economic sectors more robust and
what's your fallback position if the price of oil slips below $53/barrel--the
level on which state spending in this fiscal year is predicated?"
The FBI and IRS are plumbing the relationship
between some elected Alaska officials and money. So those who want to guide the
state on your behalf should be asked, if they're incumbents; "did you vote to
loosen rules on lobbyist reporting and on campaign contribution limits?" Additionally, "did
you vote for laws making it tougher to file ethics complaints against elected
and appointed state officials?" Challengers should be asked if they "will champion
reform measures rather than protect officials."
The legislature dramatically changed retirement
programs in a manner that makes it harder to recruit and retain talented teachers,
police officers and other public servants. It was necessary, proponents said,
to avoid future economic problems. Make way for one of those future economic
problems the changes were supposed to help us avoid.
The state is passing a $505
million retirement cost increase on to public employers, including school districts
and cities (those local employer costs, if not paid by the state, will reduce
services and/or drive up local taxes). So those who want to guide the state on
your behalf should be asked: "why is the employers' cost hikes far higher than
what the state's contract actuary recommended and why did the governor and legislature
spend so much time reducing benefits for new employees instead of controlling
soaring health care bills that really are driving system costs?"
These are just some of the questions prompted
by current events. Remember, though, that none of the answers is simplistic enough
to fit in a 30-second TV spot.

Phone: (907) 465-4947
Fax: (907) 465-2108
Mail: Sen. Kim Elton, State Capitol
Juneau, AK 99801
Got a scoop? Call or
email your tips and suggestions to any of the email
addresses below:
|
Capitol Undercurrents
A grand time?--Which
current legislative staffer and which former legislative lawyer
recently received notices summoning them to Anchorage for a
possible 18-month tour of duty on a federal grand jury that,
potentially, could be hearing cases resulting from FBI raids
on legislative offices?
So that's what "toss-up" means--After
a hand recount of
one precinct, a hand recount of the entire
house district, a review of challenged ballots by the Alaska
Supreme Court, and the counting of two previously uncounted
ballots this morning, it's a tie. Western Alaska and Aleutian
Chain incumbent Carl Moses and primary challenger Bryce Edgmon
will apparently have their race decided after a coin is tossed
up--probably Monday morning.
Greenback dependency--Republican
U.S. Senator Tom Coburn is: a combative foe of "bridges to
nowhere"; Ted Stevens' frequent budget nemesis; and a fellow
who can turn quite a phrase. He told the Christian Science
Monitor recently that congressional "earmarks are a gateway
drug on the road to spending addiction."
Grounded--If my
high school grades were as bad as the grades our university
system got from the
National Center for Public Policy and Higher
Education, I'd have been grounded by my parents. The center
graded all states' universities and colleges on: how well does
the state prepare students for education beyond high school
(Alaska got a B-); whether state residents have sufficient
opportunities to enroll in education and training beyond high
school (C+); how affordable higher education is for students
and families (F); whether students make progress toward and
complete their certificates in a timely manner (F); and what
benefits does the state receive from having a highly educated
population (B-). Just a couple of notes--only one other state
got an 'F' on completion (Nevada) and our 'F' in affordability
comes as Alaska's university regents debate today another 7
percent tuition increase after raising tuition 10 percent each
year since 2003.